Bibione - 09 June 2009

With the recent crisis, does it still make sense to make a clear distinction for their investment? It’s obvious that the two perspectives of investment of savings can not be placed in a clear contrast,"or this or that." Primarily because the property (whether the first house, or the second or your office or laboratrory) has a content profile that has no financial savings and also because any good saver must, in proportion to their ability to diversify:(bought the first house for himself, and, if possible, for the children is evident that some small savings should be kept for them). What this crisis has made clear to everyone, even for us the "real estate" agents, is that there is no safer investment as the "brick" (refers to apartments, villas and houses in villages, condominiums, apartments or resort) a face of the institution fall of global finance - such as the American merchant banks - (who ever would have imagined?) and failure in a defensive hedge funds (funds shield), who has invested in property beyond their direct needs - family or Professional- is now to have a value quite different from those who have invested in the stock market.
In essence, if you exit from direct and immediate needs and we talk about investment of a surplus there is no story: the real estates have always won 10 out of 10 and I think it will continue to win.